Head-to-head comparison of multi-dose oritavancin and dalbavancin for complicated infections: A propensity score-matched analysis

Abstract

• Background:Oritavancin and dalbavancin are long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotics approved for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections. Recently, they have been used for outpatient antimicrobial therapy for complicated infections. No head-to-head studies exist for this purpose.Objective: To compare outcomes of patients treated with multiple doses of oritavancin or dalbavancin for complicated infections.Patients and methods:This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort study evaluating adult patients who received two or more doses of lipoglycopeptides for complicated infections from February 2019 through December 2022. Patients receiving oritavancin were compared to dalbavancin after propensity score-matching. The primary endpoint was clinical success at 90 days. Other endpoints included: 30-day re-admission, 30-day mortality, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and changes in white blood cell count and inflammatory markers after the first dose.Results:After exclusions and propensity score-matching, 131 matched pairs (N = 262) were included in the analysis. Most patients were receiving lipoglycopeptide therapy for osteomyelitis. There was no significant difference in clinical success at 90 days in patients who received oritavancin compared to those who received dalbavancin (99 [76%] vs. 103 [79%], respectively; P = 0.556). There was no significant difference in secondary endpoints, however, there was a trend towards higher incidence of ADRs oritavancin compared to dalbavancin (9 [7%] vs. 2 [2%], respectively; P = 0.060) which led to more treatment discontinuation.Conclusion:There was no significant difference in efficacy between multi-dose oritavancin and dalbavancin for the treatment of complicated infections. Both agents were generally well tolerated; however, dalbavancin may be better tolerated when long-term treatment is warranted.

Zilucoplan (Zilbrysq) for myasthenia gravis

Abstract

Integrated identification-quantification (ID-Quant) workflow utilizing UPLC-QTOF-MS for the therapeutic drug monitoring of multi-component antibiotics without pure standards: Validation using teicoplanin

Abstract

• The lack of individual pure standard has hampered the application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for multi-component antibiotics in clinical laboratories. Here, we aimed to develop an integrated identification-quantification (ID-Quant) workflow based on ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QTOF-MS) to enable the comprehensive determination of all teicoplanin components without needing pure standards. The workflow comprises three steps. First, non-targeted MSE full scanning was used to detect and identify all potential ingredients. Then, characteristic product ions were selected to generate a quantitative time-of-flight multiple reaction monitoring (Tof-MRM) method. Finally, the constituent composition of teicoplanin injection was determined and utilized as an alternative reference standard to monitor the teicoplanin ingredients in human serum samples. As a result, nine teicoplanin analogs were identified from teicoplanin injection (Sanofi-Aventis, France). The overall performance of the Tof-MRM method was satisfactory in terms of linearity, precision, accuracy, and limits of detection. Utilizing the drug as standard, the individual concentrations for each component in patient serum were determined to be 0.120 µg/mL (A3-1), 0.020 µg/mL (N-1), 0.550 µg/mL (N-2), 0.730 µg/mL (A2-1), 4.26 µg/mL (A2-2,3), 4.79 µg/mL (A2-4,5), and 0.290 µg/mL (N-3), respectively. The distribution pattern of teicoplanin components was also discovered to differ from that in the drug injection. Overall, this integrated ID-Quant workflow based on UHPLC-QTOF-MS enables the robust quantitation of all teicoplanin analogs without the need for individual pure standard. This approach could help address the standard unavailability problem in the TDM of multi-component antibiotics.

Impact of a 20 mg/kg vancomycin loading dose on early AUC target attainment

Abstract

• This retrospective chart review evaluated whether 20 mg/kg vancomycin loading doses increase early area under the curve (AUC) target attainment within 48 hours in comparison to non-loading dose regimens. There were no differences between groups for the primary outcome (46 % vs. 50 %; P = 0.58).