A Prospective Comparison of Ustekinumab and Anti-TNF Therapy in the Treatment of Crohn's-like Disease of the Pouch
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many patients with chronic pouchitis and Crohn's-like disease of the pouch (CLDP) are treated with biologics; however, the comparative effectiveness of advanced therapies in this population has not been systematically evaluated. We sought to compare the effectiveness of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF) therapies and ustekinumab in patients with chronic inflammatory conditions of the pouch. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multi-center, cohort study. We included patients with chronic pouchitis and CLDP initiating treatment with anti-TNF therapies or ustekinumab. The primary outcome was clinical remission at 6 months after induction. We also evaluated clinical remission at 6 months among patients with chronic pouchitis and CLDP separately. RESULTS: Among 132 patients, 106 (80%) had a diagnosis of CLDP and 82 (62%) initiated therapy with ustekinumab. A significantly higher proportion of patients with CLDP treated with ustekinumab were in clinical remission at 6 months as compared to patients treated with anti-TNF therapy (62% vs. 40%, P=0.027) however there was no significant difference among patients with chronic pouchitis (P=0.946). There was no independent statistical significance in the odds of remission at 6 months among patients with CLDP among patients receiving ustekinumab compared to anti-TNF therapy (aOR 1.91, 95% CI 0.69-5.30) after adjusting for presence of a fistula, number of preoperative advanced therapies, and number of advanced therapies after IPAA. CONCLUSION: These data suggest the potential benefit of ustekinumab in patients with CLDP and should prompt future novel effectiveness evaluations in this population.