Research Article Details

Article ID: A02072
PMID: 34511820
Source: J Clin Exp Hepatol
Title: Quantification of Liver Fat by MRI-PDFF Imaging in Patients with Suspected Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Its Correlation with Metabolic Syndrome, Liver Function Test and Ultrasonography.
Abstract: Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-estimated proton density fat fraction (PDFF) has emerged to be a promising tool in quantification of liver fat. Aim of this study was to quantify liver fat using MRI-PDFF in patients with suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and to correlate it with the presence of metabolic syndrome (MetS), ultrasonography (USG) and liver function test (LFT). Methods: We included 111 consecutive patients who were suspected to have NAFLD on the basis of clinical, laboratory or USG findings. A 3 Tesla Phillips MRI machine was used with a software named "mDixon Quant" for quantification of the liver fat. Results: MRI-PDFF revealed hepatic steatosis grading as Grade 0 in 31 patients (28%), Grade I in 40 (36%), Grade II in 19 (17.1%) and Grade III in 21 patients (18.9%). MetS patients had higher proportion of advanced steatosis (Grades II and III) as compared to those without MetS (P&#160;< 0.001). ALT (alanine transaminase) was found to be significantly elevated (>1.5 times) in the patients with advanced steatosis as compared to patients with Grades I and 0 fatty liver on MRI-PDFF (P&#160;< 0.001). The Kappa measure of agreement between USG and MRI-PDFF was found to be 0.2, which suggests a low level of agreement between the two tests. Conclusion: MetS patients have higher proportion of advanced steatosis (Grades II and III) at MRI-PDFF as compared to those without MetS. Patients with advanced steatosis at MRI-PDFF had higher proportion of abnormal LFTs as compared to those with Grades 0 and I hepatic steatosis. There was a dis-correlation between MRI-PDFF and USG in the evaluation of NAFLD.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2020.11.004